What to look for in a stem cell clinic: 6 things you can check yourself

Look for six things. Most are on a clinic's website; ask for the rest in writing. A good answer is a name, a number or a document. A thin one is an adjective.

Running a clinic through all six takes about 10 minutes. If you have one open in the next tab, tick each check off as you go.

Start with the cells

How to choose a stem cell clinic: the six checks

Not the website, not the testimonials.

Where do the cells come from?

Ask for a named lab, a published process, a chain of custody, and material certificates on request.

  • Lab name disclosed
  • Cell type and source specified
  • Quality control and release criteria
Good

"Umbilical MSC from [named lab]. Release criteria include viability, identity, and sterility. COA available."

Bad

"Premium stem cells from a top lab."

No name, no criteria, no paper. Walk away.

Who is the physician?

A named physician with verifiable credentials, who stays with your case before and after the procedure. You aren't handed off.

  • Physician name and credentials
  • Continuity before and after
  • Hospital privileges
Good

"Your attending is Dr. [name], [credentials], with hospital privileges at [facility]."

Bad

"Our expert physician team."

If you can't name them, you can't evaluate them.

Where does the procedure happen?

The setting should be hospital-grade, with proper imaging and the ability to resuscitate. Not a spa, not a storefront.

  • Facility type disclosed
  • Imaging and monitoring
  • A plan for an adverse event

What does the cost cover?

What's included and what's not should be specific, and the terms disclosed in writing, not on a vague "starting at" basis.

  • Inclusions stated clearly
  • Exclusions itemized
  • Written payment terms
Good

Inclusions and exclusions itemized and specific, terms in writing.

Bad

"Call to discuss."

Withholding what's included is a negotiation tactic, not a medical standard.

What do they say about results?

Realistic, not miraculous. Non-response is acknowledged, and the literature is cited, not glossed.

  • Response ceiling disclosed
  • Structured follow-up
  • Declines some cases
Good

"Response varies by indication. We follow every case in clinical follow-up and decline candidates whose biology doesn't support a meaningful response."

Bad

"95% success rate."

No such number exists honestly in this space.

What happens after you go home?

Care doesn't end at discharge. Re-checks are scheduled, not left for you to chase.

  • Reviews at 6 and 12 months
  • A physician you can reach
  • Written follow-up

Hold us to the same standard

We published the framework because we're willing to be measured by it. Our material sourcing, physician structure, facility, cost terms, outcome position (we publish no outcome statistics of our own), and follow-through are all on the public site.

If a competitor does those things better, that's useful information for you. If a competitor won't answer, that's useful information too. Arguably more useful.

Nothing on this framework is proprietary. It's an adaptation of what responsible domestic specialty practices already do. Press on the check where a clinic is weakest and see how they respond.

Comparison questions

What if a clinic simply refuses to answer these questions?

Refusal is itself an answer. A serious clinic has nothing to hide on these six, and everything to gain by answering well.

Is the cheapest clinic automatically the worst?

No, and the most expensive isn't automatically the best. Cost is one check among six. Weigh it against the other five.

What about outcome photos and testimonials?

Useful, but not decisive. They select for the patients who responded. They don't show the non-responders. Weigh them accordingly.

Take the checklist to the call

The clinic checklist is 28 items in 5 sections, and it prints. Take it to any clinic intake, including ours.

Open the checklist →