Early
Mild degeneration, first presentation
Early OA or early tendinopathy. Symptoms present but structure still largely preserved.
- PT first
- PRP for tendon
- Injection for flare
Four options sit short of a joint replacement: physical therapy, cortisone or hyaluronic acid injections, PRP, and MSC (mesenchymal stem cell) therapy. None is right for every joint. Each addresses a different problem at a different stage, and sometimes the replacement is the answer.
Medically reviewed by the physician team at Hospital Angeles ยท October 2026
Three things decide it: severity, structure, and your goals. Without those, comparing options is noise.
Early
Early OA or early tendinopathy. Symptoms present but structure still largely preserved.
Middle
Moderate OA with partial joint-space preservation. Surgery has been raised but isn't urgent.
Late
Advanced OA, subchondral bone loss, mechanical instability. Function severely limited.
If you've been recommended a joint replacement, these five questions sort an "inevitable" recommendation from a conservatively-timed one. Bring this list to your next appointment.
Not "you'll walk again." Specific return-to-activity and timeline against your own baseline.
Published rates are aggregate. Your individual surgeon's rates for this specific procedure are what matter.
If the answer is "no" or "that doesn't work," ask what criteria were used.
Genuine progressive pathology looks different from "now is as good as any." The distinction is worth hearing.
Revision surgery, conversion procedures, and lifetime hardware management are real considerations, especially if you're under sixty.
The physician team declines a significant share of inquiries. Patients who have crossed structural thresholds where biology can no longer reach deserve an honest answer, not a sales pitch.
These are surgical cases, and good surgery is excellent medicine. (A contained herniated disc, even with a fusion offered, is the spine case we evaluate individually.)
End-stage osteoarthritis with bone-on-bone contact often falls here too, but if you want to delay replacement, we'll still consider treating you, just with a frank conversation about the lower expected response.
MSC therapy isn't a universal alternative to surgery. It's one option with a specific candidate profile. When surgery is the right call, we'll tell you, and refer you to surgeons whose outcomes we trust.
If you're reading marketing that promises regenerative therapy "beats surgery" for every patient, close the tab. That claim is false, and anyone making it is selling you something.
No. It has a specific candidate profile. For patients with moderate degeneration, it's a legitimate option to evaluate first. For end-stage disease, surgery is often the right answer, but if you want to delay it, we'll still consider treating you with a frank conversation about the lower expected response.
In most cases, yes. MSC therapy doesn't disqualify you from future replacement and doesn't complicate surgical planning. If your case later progresses, the surgical option remains.
Occasional cortisone for flare management is reasonable. Repeated high-frequency cortisone may accelerate cartilage loss in some patients and is increasingly discouraged for chronic OA. Ask about dose and frequency before agreeing to a series.
PRP is often reasonable for tendinopathy and mild OA. MSCs have broader application for moderate OA and post-injury degeneration. The candidate profiles differ, and the evaluation decides.
The honest answer starts with a Celva patient coordinator collecting your imaging and goals, and Celva's physician team reading them. If surgery is right, they'll say so. If MSC therapy is reasonable, they'll explain why. Neither answer comes off a package menu.
Not medical advice. Individual results vary. Candidacy is physician-determined against imaging and history.